A Call to Clarify the Intensity and Classification of Standing Behavior
AffiliationHuman Science Research Centre
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractPublic health guidelines for physical activity now include recommendations to break up prolonged sitting with light-intensity activities. Concurrently, interventions to increase standing have emerged, especially within the workplace in the form of sit–stand or standing workstations. Moreover, in short-duration studies, breaking up prolonged sitting with standing has been associated improved cardiometabolic outcomes. Publicly available estimates of the intensity of standing range from 1.5 to 2.3 metabolic equivalents (METs), neatly classifying standing as a light-intensity activity (>1.5 to <3.0 METs). Further delineation between ‘active’ and ‘passive’ standing has been proposed, with corresponding METs of >2.0 METs and ≤2.0 METs, respectively. However, this study reviews data suggesting that some standing (e.g., while performing deskwork) is substantially below the minimum light intensity activity threshold of 1.5 METs. These data bring into question whether standing should be universally classified as a light-intensity behavior. The objectives of this study are to (i) highlight discrepancies in classifying standing behavior in the human movement spectrum continuum, and (ii) to propose a realignment of the ‘active’ vs. ‘passive’ standing threshold to match the light intensity threshold to help provide a clearer research framework and subsequent public health messaging for the expected health benefits from standing.
CitationKowalsky, R.J., Stoner, L., Faghy, M.A. and Barone Gibbs, B., (2021). 'A Call to Clarify the Intensity and Classification of Standing Behavior'. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), pp. 1-5.
JournalInternational journal of environmental research and public health
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
- Workplace interventions for increasing standing or walking for decreasing musculoskeletal symptoms in sedentary workers.
- Authors: Parry SP, Coenen P, Shrestha N, O'Sullivan PB, Maher CG, Straker LM
- Issue date: 2019 Nov 17
- The user and non-user perspective: Experiences of office workers with long-term access to sit-stand workstations.
- Authors: Renaud LR, Speklé EM, van der Beek AJ, van der Ploeg HP, Pasman HR, Huysmans MA
- Issue date: 2020
- An intervention to reduce sitting and increase light-intensity physical activity at work: Design and rationale of the 'Stand & Move at Work' group randomized trial.
- Authors: Buman MP, Mullane SL, Toledo MJ, Rydell SA, Gaesser GA, Crespo NC, Hannan P, Feltes L, Vuong B, Pereira MA
- Issue date: 2017 Feb
- Breaking sitting with light activities vs structured exercise: a randomised crossover study demonstrating benefits for glycaemic control and insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetes.
- Authors: Duvivier BM, Schaper NC, Hesselink MK, van Kan L, Stienen N, Winkens B, Koster A, Savelberg HH
- Issue date: 2017 Mar
- Energy Expenditure of Standing Compared to Sitting While Conducting Office Tasks.
- Authors: Burns J, Forde C, Dockrell S
- Issue date: 2017 Nov