Are the dominant teaching theories in higher education adequate to underpin teaching practices in enterprise and entrepreneurship context?
AffiliationUniversity of Derby
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractIt can be comprehended that the models and theories which are currently used to reinforce teaching depict the education practices of transmitting knowledge from teacher to students, which is more traditional, linear, input-output construction of teaching that has dominated adult education for decades including the last half century. As numerous studies (e.g. QAA, 2018) emphasizes that both the needs of learner and learning in enterprise and entrepreneurship education (EEE) context is different from other disciplines and mainstream higher education (HE). This requires further development of teaching methods and practices that can encourage the aspirations of the learner in this particular education setting. When investigating the theories and approaches that are used to examine teaching in HE, the relevance and adequacy of them to review teaching practices in this 21st century and EEE context is a question. Thus, the need of new theoretical models and frameworks can be clearly observed. For example, to investigate teacher’s role in EEE setting, there is a need of adopting more context specific, individual-focused research methods. When the recent outcomes associated with the UK higher education are taken into account, there is an emerging key debate; i.e. are universities actually turning off potential entrepreneurs. Whether these outcomes are due to teaching, learning environment or other activities within universities, is still largely a question, hence requires further research to find answers.
CitationAluthgama-Baduge, C. and Mulholland, G. (2019). 'Are the dominant teaching theories in higher education adequate to underpin teaching practices in enterprise and entrepreneurship context?' In Mulholland, G. and Turner, J. (Eds.). 'Enterprising education in UK higher education: challenges for theory and practice'. London: Routledge, pp. 27-50
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons